bubosquared: (angry)
([personal profile] bubosquared Sep. 27th, 2001 05:12 pm)
Okay, so here's the thing.

Have there ever been any fanfic writers who got into legal trouble (or any trouble other than a flame from some parent and a reader who got his internet privildges provoked? Cause i'm getting a tad irritated about all the insistance that minors stay far, far away from the evil slash. One: you did your legal duty when you warned us. No one's likely to be suing you over one lost minor reading your page. Relax a little. Two: unless every last one of your stories is NC-17, demanding we leave your entire site is a bit over the freakin' top. And I swear, no matter how few and far between the ones who actually believe that smut is baaaaad for minors are, they are going to send me into a fucking snit one of these days. Grar!

(Note, btw, how I still count myself among 'us minors', even though according to Belgian law, I've never been of illegal age to read smut. Whoo. Novel concept, huh, slashers from countries outside the US? Fuckers.)

There is a reason none of my list require age statements. I did that quite deliberately, as a way to flip the whole fucking (smut-writing) world the two-fingered salute. It went by unnoticed (duh), but I'm still glad I made it.


From: [identity profile] sunshinegirl.livejournal.com


No, as far as I know, no one has ever gotten into any major trouble.

Yeah, some of the warning/age statement demands/etc, do go too far. I'd rather people just define for themselves whether they are old enough -- that's why my entrance graphic simply says "adult content ahead, you know how old you are." Because people generally do.

Hey, it's not like a warning would have stopped me!

From: [identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com

Re:


Exactly. Unless you're gonna do things like move an archive all the time, and pwd it, giving out the pwd only to people who've proven to be 18, you're not gonna keep minors out. (And even then.)(And yes, i've seen people do this kind of stuff.)
sandrine: (Default)

From: [personal profile] sandrine


I agree, the age thing is crap! Not just for stories, but also for movies etc.

I started reading slash when I was 13, and the first story I ever read was one of Brenda Antrim's M/K ones. Go figure! I don't have the feeling that it had any negative influence on my character development. (My Mum, of course, doesn't agree. *gg*)

Anyway, I guess basically it's not about how old you are, but how mature you feel. There are people who will *never* be old enough to read/view some stuff, and there are others who are ready for it at 11.

The problem is that it's kinda hard to decide for yourself whether you're mature enough or not. Everyone will should, "Of course I am," (pct?) even when they are not. Then again, if parents leave their children to surf the net without guidance at whatever age, I guess then *they* think their kids are mature enough ...

From: [identity profile] sorchar.livejournal.com

Because...


I, for one, have nightmares of some outraged parent suing me because their kid read my stuff. Yeah, it may be paranoid, but having the warning up gives me a little peace of mind. I don't actually expect that people who are underage will pay any attention to it - heck, my first slash writing partner was all of 15. But it makes me feel a little more secure, whether or not it does provide any legal protection.

From: [identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com

Re: Because...


Oh, but it's not warnings I'm talking about. Warnings are, as you say, covering you're ass. It's things like
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<a href:"http://www.matthewtime.com/trust.html">') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

Oh, but it's not warnings I'm talking about. Warnings are, as you say, covering you're ass. It's things like <a href:"http://www.matthewtime.com/trust.html">this</a> that set me off. Good fukcing god.

From: [identity profile] meimi.livejournal.com


Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. After all, it's not our job to 'protect' their children it's the fucking parents. And if they're not going to do their damned job it's not our fault. Not that I think sex should be outlawed like it is, just makes people think it's a -bad- thing... which it ISN'T!

From: [identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com

Re:


Exatcly. My parents have always trusted my own judgment about what I read. I read de Sade at 14, and I'm fine. I think my reading smut has had a lot to do with my lack of hang-ups about sex (as such -- I have lots of hangups about physical intimacy, but that's another thing entirely); all the reading about it made me very aware that hey! this is something natural, everybody does it, and it's not something to do in order to prove you're adult or whatnot.

From: [identity profile] girlinthecorner.livejournal.com


It's interesting. 12 year old girls are getting pregnant, and they're teaching sex-ed in elementary school, and I'll be damned if some of the stuff they show on daytime TV isn't nearly X-rated, and people are worried about corruption of children and such? I suppose if someone is old enough to fucking understand what they're reading, they're probably mature enough to read it.

Not that I, being under 18 would ever do that... never :P

From: [identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com

Re:


*applause* Thank you, that was exatcly what I was thinking.

From: [identity profile] ex-shadowlig161.livejournal.com


There is a reason none of my list require age statements. I did that quite deliberately, as a way to flip the whole fucking (smut-writing) world the two-fingered salute. It went by unnoticed (duh), but I'm still glad I made it.

Not entirely unnoticed. ^_^ And I'm glad you did, too.

Novel concept, huh, slashers from countries outside the US? Fuckers.

*nods* Canada doesn't really have a set age of consent. There's something like a three-year rule for actual sex - ie. if you're fourteen and sleeping with a nineteen-year-old, that's illegal [*raises hand guiltily*], while if you're twelve and sleeping with a fifteen-year-old, that's just peachy. So, I dunno. Maybe I'm allowed to read slash, as long as the characters are nineteen and under?

But my point is, the slash/fanfic community is, by definition, a global one, and shouldn't have to be defined by American laws - especially since theirs seem to be the most unrelenting and [from my point of view] unreasonable.

And.. well, you know how I feel about all this. Maybe I can't really feel any other way, given the position I'm in, but.. yeah. Y'know.


From: [identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com


Not entirely unnoticed. ^_^ And I'm glad you did, too.



Ta. ^_^ I know a number of people did muchly appreciate not having to lie about their ages (like, hello, the current listmom! :D), but the fanfic world at large is unaware of rareslash. Which is kinda weird, cause it's a goddamn huge list these days.

(And I miss my intimate little listlet. Sigh. But time moves on.)

Legal age for actual intercourse in Belgium is 16, and we also have the three-year-rule when you're between 16 and 18. (Which, to me, sorta makes sense, you know? Cause 3 years can be a big age gap at that age, and it's so easy for older people to pressure a younger partner into something they're not really ready for.)

I could check out de Sade and other erotic/prnographic novels from the library when I was 14, so I'm assuming that's legal age for reading smut. (I'm not sure, though.) so as I said, I've never done anything illegal for me, and no one could get sued for letting me at the smut, either. (Not that my parents would've sued, but. You know.)

And hey, rant away! =D

coneyislandbaby: (Default)

From: [personal profile] coneyislandbaby

I totally agree


I always wanted to say that.

I mean, I've been reading trashy romance novels since I was about ten, and though they weren't as explicit back then as they are now, they were still thought of as pretty racy.

Not to mention I've been reading Jackie Collins (RPFic for the masses with changed names/circumstances/times) since I was fifteen, and everyone thinks she writes such explicit stuff. I just finished her latest one a couple of weeks ago, and although it was a good read and fun to pick who the celeb characters were based on, I've read much more explicit stuff in other books.

But, like some said, I do believe in initial warnings.

I've never required age statements, though on one list I had the over eighteen thing in the descript, only as a CYA, though, I knowingly let someone underage on it, because I thought she could handle it.

Speaking of, did you get my mail about that? I sent it a couple of days ago, and said yes, and that I wanted it on joannec@hwy.com.au, in case you didn't get it.
.

Profile

bubosquared: (Default)
Sofie 'Melle' Werkers

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags