Offered without comment:
Who is going to want to see Downey Jr. and Law make out? I don't think it would be appealing to women.
- Former Post movie critic Michael Medved, re: rumours that there's a fair bit of subtext in the new Sherlock Holmes movie.
From:
no subject
Oh yeah...
From:
no subject
But seriously, even non-slashers aren't really going to be turned off by a movie containing Jude Law and Robert Downey, Jr. just cause they make out a little, I don't think. Which ... isn't even what's actually going on in the movie, but whatever.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
... A lot of whom seem to be violently closeted, so will probably go and see it anyway, now that I think about it. So you have a point. :D
(Seriously, what is it about a certain breed of straight guy that they're perfectly fine getting off to fauxbians and yet it does not occur to them that women might like boytouching? Logic: get you some!)
From:
no subject
(I don't even know. Straight boys are like a different species.)
Also have I mentioned how much I love that this guy almost won American Idol? America got trolled.
From:
no subject
and yet I've known a number of them for whom "Hey, if I like girltouching, girls must like boytouching, yes?" was a perfectly logical train of thought. It's like they escaped the "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, Evolutionary Psychologists are from Uranus" brainwashing!
Also have I mentioned how much I love that this guy almost won American Idol? America got trolled.
... My bunk: I'll be in it. O_O
From:
no subject
But wait, there's more!
Seriously. People throw bras and panties and handcuffs and whip at him on stage. At an IDOL CONCERT. *rolls around it it all, laughing*
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm just going to post more pictures now.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Suddenly I understand Bella Swan a bit better.From:
no subject
awful, awfulfacial hair. XD I love this guy.*mocks you*From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I did wonder why, given that he's described as a former film critic, he was even getting a platform to spout his ill-informed opinion anymore, but then your American medcia baffles me on a daily basis, I fear.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
"Holmes, does your depravity know no bounds?" "No."
I concede your point wholly and completely. So looking forward to this movie! \o/
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(I actually have a feminist theory about why this whole boytouching thing is such a strange comcept for people to understand, but I'm trying to avoid tealdearing at you.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
about porn.From:
no subject
But seriously though, I thought we had grown out of the whole "Women can't have sexual interests" thing. Would he really be saying that if, say, Amy Adams and Anne Hathaway (uh, my bunk awaits, excuse me) were making out instead?
From:
no subject
Oh, we can have sexual interests, just only in the kind of things the boys tell us we're interested in, and definitely not something like men making out, because that makes the straight boys uncomfortable (and I have issues with that assertion as well, but one point at a time), so clearly it cannot turn their girlfriends on OR ELSE!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Who is this idiot, and has he ever been introduced to this thing called 'the internet' before?
Also, Robert Downey Jr. kissing the (handsome) guy playing Watson in the (ridiculous looking) movie? H-O-T HOT!
Really, the only reason I want to see the movie at all is Rachel McAdams in that snazzy corset ensemble. She is adorable-sexy, and I'm getting so ridiculously excited for The Time Traveler's Wife that a little part of my brain hasn't stopped squeeing since I found out about her playing Clare.