I used translate.ru (http://www.translate.ru) and it gave me this:
"[ the English-speaking original on site Fem Geeks] Most frequently meeting objections against RPS Pair remarks before we shall start: Brief definitions of below used terms: abbreviation RPS means ñëýø with participation of real-life people; FPS means ñëýø with participation of invented characters. The composer of it FMO did not set as to itself the purpose to convince all that RPS is well, or, at least, not too bad. It only attempt to avoid unnecessary confrontation and necessity to both parties(sides) to repeat the reasons and kontr-reasons again and again. Please, do not use this FMO on the sites without ïðåäâàðèòåëíîãî the sanction. Accommodation of the reference on Fem Geeks (the original English-speaking version) or Estilo. Livre (the Russian-speaking version) is supposed.
"So, most frequently stated claims to RPS: RPS is a malignant gossip and slander of anything similar. It would be slander if we with dirty intentions distributed on light from a finger the exhausted histories, assuring all that is the truth. To ôàíôèêàì categories RPS always are applied extensive and detailed äèñêëàìàöèè, and these histories not to do much harm - we simply are written share with each other by the imaginations. Thus, only one of conditions - distribution of doubtful data - is carried out, so RPS it is impossible to name slander. Strictly speaking, from the point of view of legality it is much more safe to write about Äåéâèäå Are spiritual and Whether Íèêå, rather than about Ìàëäåðå and Êðàé÷åêå for infringement of copyrights remains infringement of copyrights even despite of all äèñêëàìàöèè
"RPS breaks the right on private(individual) life of about whom write How ôàíàòñêîå creativity can break someone's right on private(individual) life? If someone suddenly will decide to publish in a network of a detail of in what are engaged in bed, say, Áåí Àôôëåê and Ãâèíåò Ïýëòðîó, it will be infringement of the right on private(individual) life. If someone describes the imaginations on a theme of what, on her(it) or to his(its) opinion, would be engaged in bed Mett Äåéìîí and Áåí Àôôëåê - somewhere in the parallel world in which they would be lovers-, it will be only imagination, and no more that.
"To "Heroes" RPS it can be unpleasant Actually. But FPS too can be - and was - unpleasant to someone, for example to Floor Äýððîó and William Shatneru. That ôàíôèêè wrote about the characters played by them, instead of about them, yet does not mean, that they can not be it çàäåòû, or have no same right to take offence, as "victims" RPS. If the care of possible(probable) reaction of involved people is the reason of performances(statements) against RPS, then in general it is necessary to forbid ñëýø unintentionally to not cause emotional sufferings to those to whom this genre is not pleasant"
"RPS it is necessary to hold at itself And it(him) anybody and does not bear(take out) on a general review. Ôàíôèêè do not get in open sources without preliminary written consent of moderators and even if it happens to various preventions(warnings) íåñòü numbers. Not considering Nifty, RPS-archives are not registered in search machines, as well as the lists of dispatch devoted to these. Simply so unintentionally to encounter on RPS it is practically impossible, but even if it has suddenly taken place, to read preventions(warnings) enough and to leave. We use the best efforts to come to naught probability of casual "meeting" with RPS, however in our duties the safety does not enter into networks for so sensitive users, even if it(he) or she(it) - a celebrity.
"RPS can get on eyes its(her) "heroes" and - or their friends and relatives it Is possible, but it is improbable. Existence RPF in general is not such a secret for family seales. Celebrities are perfectly informed that about them write ôàíôèêè and that many of these stories talk about romantic or sexual attitudes(relations) of the author with these celebrities. They know, that there are as ãåòåðî-, and homosexual variants so hardly they purposely will go on their searches. Besides, they I can come across on FPS, and it too will touch them, about it already was told above.
"You involve to ñëýøó excessive attention, and all this finally can leave to all of us sideways something I do not see, what it is in the image. RPS no more "ïóáëè÷åí" or "is swept up", rather than it is simple ñëýø, besides it(he) is much more lawful.
"Celebrities can not know, that authors RPS actually are not ñòàëêåðàìè, and can count RPS a celebrity dangerous Also can not know, that all others ñëýøåðû are not ñòàëêåðàìè, or even in general all authors ôàíôèêîâ as a whole. Features ïîáåðè, about one separately taken admirer they can not tell, that it(he) or she(it) is not ñòàëêåðîì. Why it is writing RPS start to suspect first of all? Unless Mark Chepmen wrote ñëýø about group Bitlz? *
"Interestingly, as though you çàïåëè if someone started to write ñëýø about you? I think, the majority of authors will tell something starting(beginning) from " to me all the same " up to " I shall feel slightly flattered ". And, certainly, the unique true answer to it is that we have no the right to attribute another the moral values. That means what to argue in this occasion simply senselessly.
"The conclusion If you categorically against RPS - well, ïðêðàñíî, simply do not read that is not pleasant to you. If existence RPS for any reason forces you to test awkwardness - too anything terrible, safely pass past. However do not overlook, that if something seems to you unacceptable, it does not mean yet, that all others should agree with your point of view. Composer Armelle Amaya
"* I bring the sincere apologies to which admirers Bitlz, it could touch. Simply very much frequently people asked me: " you Remember John Lennona? " And I have felt necessity to answer this concrete reason. I do not try to underestimate tragedy or to justify murder Ëåííîíà, I only try to prove to people, that between RPS and ñòàëêåðàìè there is no communication(connection)."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
"[ the English-speaking original on site Fem Geeks] Most frequently meeting objections against RPS Pair remarks before we shall start: Brief definitions of below used terms: abbreviation RPS means ñëýø with participation of real-life people; FPS means ñëýø with participation of invented characters. The composer of it FMO did not set as to itself the purpose to convince all that RPS is well, or, at least, not too bad. It only attempt to avoid unnecessary confrontation and necessity to both parties(sides) to repeat the reasons and kontr-reasons again and again. Please, do not use this FMO on the sites without ïðåäâàðèòåëíîãî the sanction. Accommodation of the reference on Fem Geeks (the original English-speaking version) or Estilo. Livre (the Russian-speaking version) is supposed.
"So, most frequently stated claims to RPS: RPS is a malignant gossip and slander of anything similar. It would be slander if we with dirty intentions distributed on light from a finger the exhausted histories, assuring all that is the truth. To ôàíôèêàì categories RPS always are applied extensive and detailed äèñêëàìàöèè, and these histories not to do much harm - we simply are written share with each other by the imaginations. Thus, only one of conditions - distribution of doubtful data - is carried out, so RPS it is impossible to name slander. Strictly speaking, from the point of view of legality it is much more safe to write about Äåéâèäå Are spiritual and Whether Íèêå, rather than about Ìàëäåðå and Êðàé÷åêå for infringement of copyrights remains infringement of copyrights even despite of all äèñêëàìàöèè
"RPS breaks the right on private(individual) life of about whom write How ôàíàòñêîå creativity can break someone's right on private(individual) life? If someone suddenly will decide to publish in a network of a detail of in what are engaged in bed, say, Áåí Àôôëåê and Ãâèíåò Ïýëòðîó, it will be infringement of the right on private(individual) life. If someone describes the imaginations on a theme of what, on her(it) or to his(its) opinion, would be engaged in bed Mett Äåéìîí and Áåí Àôôëåê - somewhere in the parallel world in which they would be lovers-, it will be only imagination, and no more that.
"To "Heroes" RPS it can be unpleasant Actually. But FPS too can be - and was - unpleasant to someone, for example to Floor Äýððîó and William Shatneru. That ôàíôèêè wrote about the characters played by them, instead of about them, yet does not mean, that they can not be it çàäåòû, or have no same right to take offence, as "victims" RPS. If the care of possible(probable) reaction of involved people is the reason of performances(statements) against RPS, then in general it is necessary to forbid ñëýø unintentionally to not cause emotional sufferings to those to whom this genre is not pleasant"
(con't...)
From:
no subject
"RPS it is necessary to hold at itself And it(him) anybody and does not bear(take out) on a general review. Ôàíôèêè do not get in open sources without preliminary written consent of moderators and even if it happens to various preventions(warnings) íåñòü numbers. Not considering Nifty, RPS-archives are not registered in search machines, as well as the lists of dispatch devoted to these. Simply so unintentionally to encounter on RPS it is practically impossible, but even if it has suddenly taken place, to read preventions(warnings) enough and to leave. We use the best efforts to come to naught probability of casual "meeting" with RPS, however in our duties the safety does not enter into networks for so sensitive users, even if it(he) or she(it) - a celebrity.
"RPS can get on eyes its(her) "heroes" and - or their friends and relatives it Is possible, but it is improbable. Existence RPF in general is not such a secret for family seales. Celebrities are perfectly informed that about them write ôàíôèêè and that many of these stories talk about romantic or sexual attitudes(relations) of the author with these celebrities. They know, that there are as ãåòåðî-, and homosexual variants so hardly they purposely will go on their searches. Besides, they I can come across on FPS, and it too will touch them, about it already was told above.
"You involve to ñëýøó excessive attention, and all this finally can leave to all of us sideways something I do not see, what it is in the image. RPS no more "ïóáëè÷åí" or "is swept up", rather than it is simple ñëýø, besides it(he) is much more lawful.
"Celebrities can not know, that authors RPS actually are not ñòàëêåðàìè, and can count RPS a celebrity dangerous Also can not know, that all others ñëýøåðû are not ñòàëêåðàìè, or even in general all authors ôàíôèêîâ as a whole. Features ïîáåðè, about one separately taken admirer they can not tell, that it(he) or she(it) is not ñòàëêåðîì. Why it is writing RPS start to suspect first of all? Unless Mark Chepmen wrote ñëýø about group Bitlz? *
"Interestingly, as though you çàïåëè if someone started to write ñëýø about you? I think, the majority of authors will tell something starting(beginning) from " to me all the same " up to " I shall feel slightly flattered ". And, certainly, the unique true answer to it is that we have no the right to attribute another the moral values. That means what to argue in this occasion simply senselessly.
"The conclusion If you categorically against RPS - well, ïðêðàñíî, simply do not read that is not pleasant to you. If existence RPS for any reason forces you to test awkwardness - too anything terrible, safely pass past. However do not overlook, that if something seems to you unacceptable, it does not mean yet, that all others should agree with your point of view. Composer Armelle Amaya
"* I bring the sincere apologies to which admirers Bitlz, it could touch. Simply very much frequently people asked me: " you Remember John Lennona? " And I have felt necessity to answer this concrete reason. I do not try to underestimate tragedy or to justify murder Ëåííîíà, I only try to prove to people, that between RPS and ñòàëêåðàìè there is no communication(connection)."
It's rough, but you get the general idea.
From:
Re:
*stunned*
From:
no subject