I used translate.ru (http://www.translate.ru) and it gave me this:
"[ the English-speaking original on site Fem Geeks] Most frequently meeting objections against RPS Pair remarks before we shall start: Brief definitions of below used terms: abbreviation RPS means ñëýø with participation of real-life people; FPS means ñëýø with participation of invented characters. The composer of it FMO did not set as to itself the purpose to convince all that RPS is well, or, at least, not too bad. It only attempt to avoid unnecessary confrontation and necessity to both parties(sides) to repeat the reasons and kontr-reasons again and again. Please, do not use this FMO on the sites without ïðåäâàðèòåëíîãî the sanction. Accommodation of the reference on Fem Geeks (the original English-speaking version) or Estilo. Livre (the Russian-speaking version) is supposed.
"So, most frequently stated claims to RPS: RPS is a malignant gossip and slander of anything similar. It would be slander if we with dirty intentions distributed on light from a finger the exhausted histories, assuring all that is the truth. To ôàíôèêàì categories RPS always are applied extensive and detailed äèñêëàìàöèè, and these histories not to do much harm - we simply are written share with each other by the imaginations. Thus, only one of conditions - distribution of doubtful data - is carried out, so RPS it is impossible to name slander. Strictly speaking, from the point of view of legality it is much more safe to write about Äåéâèäå Are spiritual and Whether Íèêå, rather than about Ìàëäåðå and Êðàé÷åêå for infringement of copyrights remains infringement of copyrights even despite of all äèñêëàìàöèè
"RPS breaks the right on private(individual) life of about whom write How ôàíàòñêîå creativity can break someone's right on private(individual) life? If someone suddenly will decide to publish in a network of a detail of in what are engaged in bed, say, Áåí Àôôëåê and Ãâèíåò Ïýëòðîó, it will be infringement of the right on private(individual) life. If someone describes the imaginations on a theme of what, on her(it) or to his(its) opinion, would be engaged in bed Mett Äåéìîí and Áåí Àôôëåê - somewhere in the parallel world in which they would be lovers-, it will be only imagination, and no more that.
"To "Heroes" RPS it can be unpleasant Actually. But FPS too can be - and was - unpleasant to someone, for example to Floor Äýððîó and William Shatneru. That ôàíôèêè wrote about the characters played by them, instead of about them, yet does not mean, that they can not be it çàäåòû, or have no same right to take offence, as "victims" RPS. If the care of possible(probable) reaction of involved people is the reason of performances(statements) against RPS, then in general it is necessary to forbid ñëýø unintentionally to not cause emotional sufferings to those to whom this genre is not pleasant"
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
(Hey, at least I can read it. I just, well, need to figure out what the words mean).
Maybe you'd have more luck with one of the bad-translator sites, eh? I'm curious as hell, now.
Re:
From:From:
no subject
"[ the English-speaking original on site Fem Geeks] Most frequently meeting objections against RPS Pair remarks before we shall start: Brief definitions of below used terms: abbreviation RPS means ñëýø with participation of real-life people; FPS means ñëýø with participation of invented characters. The composer of it FMO did not set as to itself the purpose to convince all that RPS is well, or, at least, not too bad. It only attempt to avoid unnecessary confrontation and necessity to both parties(sides) to repeat the reasons and kontr-reasons again and again. Please, do not use this FMO on the sites without ïðåäâàðèòåëíîãî the sanction. Accommodation of the reference on Fem Geeks (the original English-speaking version) or Estilo. Livre (the Russian-speaking version) is supposed.
"So, most frequently stated claims to RPS: RPS is a malignant gossip and slander of anything similar. It would be slander if we with dirty intentions distributed on light from a finger the exhausted histories, assuring all that is the truth. To ôàíôèêàì categories RPS always are applied extensive and detailed äèñêëàìàöèè, and these histories not to do much harm - we simply are written share with each other by the imaginations. Thus, only one of conditions - distribution of doubtful data - is carried out, so RPS it is impossible to name slander. Strictly speaking, from the point of view of legality it is much more safe to write about Äåéâèäå Are spiritual and Whether Íèêå, rather than about Ìàëäåðå and Êðàé÷åêå for infringement of copyrights remains infringement of copyrights even despite of all äèñêëàìàöèè
"RPS breaks the right on private(individual) life of about whom write How ôàíàòñêîå creativity can break someone's right on private(individual) life? If someone suddenly will decide to publish in a network of a detail of in what are engaged in bed, say, Áåí Àôôëåê and Ãâèíåò Ïýëòðîó, it will be infringement of the right on private(individual) life. If someone describes the imaginations on a theme of what, on her(it) or to his(its) opinion, would be engaged in bed Mett Äåéìîí and Áåí Àôôëåê - somewhere in the parallel world in which they would be lovers-, it will be only imagination, and no more that.
"To "Heroes" RPS it can be unpleasant Actually. But FPS too can be - and was - unpleasant to someone, for example to Floor Äýððîó and William Shatneru. That ôàíôèêè wrote about the characters played by them, instead of about them, yet does not mean, that they can not be it çàäåòû, or have no same right to take offence, as "victims" RPS. If the care of possible(probable) reaction of involved people is the reason of performances(statements) against RPS, then in general it is necessary to forbid ñëýø unintentionally to not cause emotional sufferings to those to whom this genre is not pleasant"
(con't...)
(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From: