This still amuses me. Free The LiveJournal Three! Possible because it's late and I'm immresed in my IRA research and well, I'm trying to make sense of it all and it's nice to have things like this to lugh about so there.
Controversy because it was incest? Or because Gabrielle seems so young? Or because if you continue to follow the implications you'll end up at Harry/Ron?
IIRC, because people claimed the author was saying (abusive) incest was okay. (I my be wrong, though, was somewhat in and out of the dicussion at the time.)
Actually, I think it was more because something the author said in either hre A/N or in later discussion about the story. Still, though, I didn't get the impression she thought it was okay.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
From:
Re: H/R outrage, part 2.
From:
Re: H/R outrage, part 2.
From:
Re: H/R outrage, part 2.
From:
Re: H/R outrage, part 2.