(Note: obviously, when I say 'anti's', I do mean the rabid ones, not the mere non-RPS people.)
Of course, pointing that out to people isn't gonna get me anywhere. I'm starting to get really jaded about this whole issue. I've been through the motions so many times I can make up an RPF argument on the spot. Proof:
Anti: "It's illegal!"And so further, and so on. But of course, I have a flawed perspective. And lots of sarcasm to go with it, too.
Me: "The illegality of RPF is doubtful at best. <lots of elaoration, mostly stolen from Vali> And anyway, the illegality of FPF is much more certain and more likely to be actually sued. There are examples known of people being faced with C&D letters for FPS, whereas RPF has been published in public forums such as Penthouse, etc., and has been safe thus far. There are even a number of lawsuits which could be used as precedents, should it ever come to an actual RPF lawsuit. <insert examples here>Anti: "It's immoral!"
Me: "According to whom? You think it's immoral. Many people don't. Not everybody shares the same set of morals. Many people think FPS is immoral. A number of people even think FPF is immoral. What is the difference between them telling you we can't write this and you telling me I can't write RPF?
Anti: "But RPF can hurt the subject!"
Me: "So can FPF. In fact, there are documented cases of actors being hurt and insulted by FPF."
From:
no subject