They are my word, they are my works, they are mine to decide about. If I ever found one of my stories on an archive I did not give archiving permission to, I will be right pissed off. I think a distributing license is not that bad an idea, considering the many opinions on what an archiving permission entails, and the many people who still think they have a right to archive anything they want, regardless of the author's consent.
(This is a general rant. I know nothing about the whole MA situation, so i'm keeping quiet about that. This is just about archving permissions in general)
(Edit: I know it seems ridiculous to even forbid emailing a copy to one's friend, but I've seen more than a few cases where where that went horribly wrong. It's not all about ego.)
From:
Re: