bubosquared: (Default)
Sofie 'Melle' Werkers ([personal profile] bubosquared) wrote2002-04-03 10:34 pm
Entry tags:

Help!

Need HTML advice. You know how, when you put an image on a page, at the top or on the side of the page, there's always this little margin of five or so pixels between the image and the top/side of the page, right?

How do I make that go away? I'm trying to do something frame-wise, see.

[identity profile] drazzi.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
In the BODY tag add leftmargin="0" and topmargin="0" ^.^

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! Of course that doesn't work in Netscape, but I'm the only one who uses NN4 anymore, anyway. :D

[identity profile] leici.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I still use it. The other versions of Netscape suck.

Re:

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Then I guess we'll both have to live with a crappy version of my site. :/

[identity profile] leici.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Poor Melle. I personally think they should can Netscape 6 and make something that works. :p

[identity profile] sivan.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I think if you add marginheight=0 and marginwidth=0, both in the BODY tag as well, that should take care of that?

Re:

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
YES! THANK YOU! :D
rsadelle: (Default)

[personal profile] rsadelle 2002-04-03 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Frames are evil and should die.

Re:

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
But sometimes, they're the only thing that make a page manageable. :/
rsadelle: (Default)

[personal profile] rsadelle 2002-04-03 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Frames are never managable on a 640x480 resolution.

Re:

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
V. few people are still on a 640x480 resolution. And basically, most layouts are almost unmanageable for 640x480 resolutions. :/ Choices to make between a pretty site and a univerally accessible one, I guess.
rsadelle: (Default)

[personal profile] rsadelle 2002-04-04 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't even like frames when I'm using a higher resolution. They're a pain. They get in the way and mess up the easy ways to go back. I almost always right-click and open in new window when I'm stuck on a frames site.

[identity profile] silverrain.livejournal.com 2002-04-03 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's practical in the way you're using it, just set it as a background. That was generally what I did.

|shrug?|

--bb