Sofie 'Melle' Werkers (
bubosquared) wrote2002-03-21 09:31 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Managed to pack, clean and cook in an hour and a half. Wow. Go me.
Had an epiphany on the train home, but kat already said it best Because really, people, I'll be a lot more likely to shrug off, say, an anti-gay site when I stumble upon it that I would when it's been thrusted in my face and I've been ordered to read it, all while I was actually trying to have a nice dinner.
RPS has been "outed" before, in Q Magazine. That was a slight "eep", but then I didn't worry about it anymore. This? If it' true (big if, but still), it's scary as fuck.
Also, maladygirl has come up with the perfect name for the idiotic lotrippers:
lotwits
no subject
And a couple of years ago Entertainment Weekly had a big spread about fanfic in general, including RPS.
Re:
Sorry. It's just. The whole mindset that celebrities somehow owe us something is mindboggling to me. I've always said it's not my job to make the web safe and inoffensive for anyone, not even celebrities, but the "they're not special people" thing goes both ways, you know? They don't get any special consideration from me, but just as I'd not dream of disturbing a non-celeb's dinner, I'd never ever do that to a celeb.
Why is this so hard a concept to grab for so many people? Celebrities are human too. You don't own them!
no subject
Celebrities have a certain obligation to the public that's just part of their job. Just like, you know, dealing with cheating, lying undergrads is part of my job. I may not like it, but it's there. However, celebrities are only human and there is taking things too far. Like in this case.
Okay, rambling, probably not making much sense. Gonna stop now. *g*
Re:
no subject
Mind telling that to the undergrads though? ;)