Sofie 'Melle' Werkers (
bubosquared) wrote2001-11-18 12:21 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Note to this doofus: Childhood innocence is a myth! Jebus. No one's gonna be scarred for life because they knew what sex is before they're 15. Reading explicit stories at a young age does not necessarily traumatise a child. Look at me! I got sex ed at 3, read smut at 12 and de Sade at 14, and i'm perfectly fine.
Muttermumblenotmyjobtoprotectyourfreakingkidsgrumble
no subject
Re:
ggrrr
stupid people make me wanna scream...
Re: ggrrr
no subject
If I didn't know what oral sex was at age eleven, I would have been laughed out of my school. Blimey. I think it's safe to say that once a person is in the fifth grade, they should - and generally do - know all of the ins and outs of sex. What do these kids talk about at the lunch table? How titillating the meatloaf is?
Honestly.
no subject
no subject
:)
that's my "me too" supportive face.
no subject
no subject
I was more scarred by the notion that sex is bad than I was by finding about sex itself.
So, in theory, wouldn't keeping kids from *positive* depictions and attitides about sex fuck them up more?
Re:
Re:
no subject
Re:
::shakes head in disgust::
Good grief. In my family, it became sort of a game between my sister and I to see how long it would take to get my mom addicted to the smut novels she was letting my sister read. Lessee. I was 9, my sis was 11. We're both fine now. The areas in which we aren't fine have nothing to do with sex ed or lack thereof.
They're going to learn about it one way or another, so you might as well just let them.
Re: ::shakes head in disgust::