bubosquared: (Default)
Sofie 'Melle' Werkers ([personal profile] bubosquared) wrote2001-10-20 11:38 pm

Erk.

[identity profile] thegrimtuesday.livejournal.com 2001-10-20 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, I'd like to submit something for this endevour, but first, I'd like to know just what your looking for.

:)

Re: Erk.

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2001-10-20 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Real People Slash. Musicians, actors, historical people. Antyhing in that realm. M/M, f/f, tryads, quads, whatever. :)

Re: Erk.

[identity profile] thegrimtuesday.livejournal.com 2001-10-20 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooo. Would the hotties from my French class apply, or does it have to be someone everone knows?

Re: Erk.

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2001-10-20 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Er, i'm afraid some degree of celebrity is required, yes. Sawwie!

Re: Erk.

[identity profile] thegrimtuesday.livejournal.com 2001-10-20 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Crap. I'll see if I can come up with anything...
coneyislandbaby: (Default)

To elaborate, as asked

[personal profile] coneyislandbaby 2001-10-21 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I was thinking that if it's not a complete violation of copyright, which of course just crossed my mind, it might be interesting to have some slashy quotes from the sources in the zine (I mean, I'm sure someone will do someone where there's lots of that kind of fodder). But if it would be too copyright violational (I'm not sure if that's a word) it might not be a good idea.

Re: To elaborate, as asked

[identity profile] bubosquared.livejournal.com 2001-10-22 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, we don't want to do something illegal, like copyright violation, would we? *snicker* (I'm being snarky, ignore me. I'm still waiting for the first enraged anti to email me in a panic of "You're going to get us all sued!" I'm easily amused.)

I don't think quotes are copyright violation, especially in the case of "real people". And good idea!
coneyislandbaby: (Default)

Re: To elaborate, as asked

[personal profile] coneyislandbaby 2001-10-22 08:29 am (UTC)(link)
*giggle*

Of course we wouldn't. Not at all. Us? Violate copyright? Never!

Thanks. It just struck me.

Also, we'd attribute the source, like newspapers do, and I think that's legal. I hope so or the papers will be the ones who end up sued *g*.