![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
We now learn that some people have a mind-bogglingly broad definition of plagiarism, or at least of "heavy borrowing." Look, how do I put this in simple terms? You cannot "own" a vague idea.
If someone copies large chunks of your exact wording and claims it as their own (or at least doesn't attibute the quotes), that's plagiarism.
If someone takes the plot of your story and rewrites it in their own words, that's what you'd call "heavy borrowing". Depending on how much of the plot they take, the heaviness of the borrowing may vary, but. Basically, that's the principle. Needless to say though, this only goes if the author has actually read the story they're borrowing from; otherwise it's just a freaky coincidence.
Now. Say you write a story in a fandom, set at a point in the timeline no one has written about before. Say, a month or two later, you come across another story in that fandom, set at (what you assume to be) that point in the timeline. Other than the "timing," and the pairing, the two stories don't really bear any resemblance whatsoever. Is that plagiarism? Is that "heavy borrowing"? Er, no. Light borrowing, maybe. Inspiration is more likely. Congratulations! You've started a trend. Do not go about leavind messages in people's guestbooks about this supposed "heavy borrowing."
Kee-rist. I suppose that means any and all Sex Pistols stories set pre-band are "heavily borrowed" from Playtime. Or actually, I guess all SP slash is heavily borrowed from me. And all the U2 slash, too. And hey, at least part of Biker Mice from Mars slash is borrowed from me. Hmpf. I get no acknowledgement.
Fuckers.
Re:
Re: