(no subject)

[bubosquared]

Mr Clinton, sir? We need you back. I need you back. All I can think of when I hear Bush is "Oh god, no no, don't talk about retaliation, don't talk about revenge, don't talk about more violence!" I want Clinton back. For whatever reason, he felt safe. LIke he was in control. like he would understand.

(I make no sense.)

Comments

[strandia.livejournal.com]

No, I'm thinking that too. I'm not American, so maybe I don't know, but I just don't trust Bush at all to even attempt to solve things peacefully. This is the perfect opportunity for war, and I don't doubt that Bush will take it, and that scares the shit out of me. Clinton, I'd trust a little more. There'd be less dread. I think.

[ex-frown243.livejournal.com]

I don't have a political affiliation of any kind, but I really think that Bush will prove himself to be worthy of handling the nation in this time of need. While Democrats are more peace oriented, Republicans are notorious for being military-oriented. While that can be dangerous if you're looking for a quick ending to everything, it also means that they have a better grasp on security and defense.

That's just my two cents, though.

[jotun.livejournal.com]

Clinton? Oh you mean the guy that bombed asprin factories in foreign nations to divert media attention from him and his complete and utter lack of professionalism? Nah, you can keep the guy.

you do make sense

[dine.livejournal.com]

I've been thinking the same thing; Clinton inspired more confidence in his ability to handle a crisis. I'm not even taking this to a political party level, it's a gut feeling based on personality and persona - Bush hasn't impressed me much to date, and I worry about the language of reliation or revenge.

*snorts*

[meimi.livejournal.com]

As an American who's quite used to the 'people in power' playing upon the majority, I can easily tell you that Clinton would be saying the same fucking thing. x_x